Unapproved Building Could Cost You

EmailEmail Print Share
News24 marketing banner

13 Sep 2013

The Supreme Court of Appeal recently ruled that courts do not have a discretion to grant a demolition order unless an individual can prove that they cannot afford or access any other form of housing in terms of section 26 (3) of the Constitution. 

Building without approved plans could lead to financial loss should a court rule that you need to demolish the structure.

In an August 2013 court case, Professor Mathew Lester, a tax professor at the University of Rhodes in Grahamstown, was instructed to demolish his home to the amount of about R8 million due to his neighbour’s objections to his building plans. 

The new building project interfered with his neighbour’s panoramic view of the ocean and objections were lodged at the local municipality on the basis that the title deed restrictions did not allow for two separate dwellings on one property. Pending the local municipality’s final decision on this objection, Lester continued to build. 

After six applications to Court and three sets of revised architectural plans, the local municipality still did not approve Lester’s plans to extend his home and consequently, the municipality had to apply to Court for the demolition of the dwelling. 

Lester then instituted a counter-application, asking the court to allow the dwelling to be altered, so as to avoid the demolition order.  However the High Court in Grahamstown ruled that since the building plans did not comply with statutory and zoning requirements and Lester did not allege that he could not afford alternative housing in terms of the Constitution, the demolition order had to be granted. 

The Supreme Court of Appeal stated that it was acutely aware of the financial misfortune which the demolition would cause, however the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act inevitably outweighed such personal considerations and therefore the dwelling had to be demolished.

Let this be a warning to all. - Sika Ackotia 

About the Author
Sika Ackotia

Sika Ackotia

Sika Ackotia is a candidate attorney in the Property Department at Schindlers Attorneys. She pays daily attention to Court Procedure, Property Law and resolving disputes against City of Johannesburg Municipality. Her interests also lie in Corporate and Labour Law.

Similar Articles

What happens when a relationship deteriorates, or when one...

A reader says they bought a property where the tenant has...

A Property24 reader asks how long the landlord can hold...

View all articles

Top Articles

Lifestyle farms tucked away in the Western Cape’s Ceres...

Located between Cape Town and Cape Point, Hout Bay offers...

Allergies are notorious for causing itchy eyes, sneezing...

View all articles
Top Articles
06 Feb 2016
Located between Cape Town and Cape Point, Hout Bay offers investors a wi...
05 Feb 2016
Are you a sophisticated, modern professional ready to get a foothold in ...
05 Feb 2016
Comprising 2 000sqm and 29 shops, Blouberg Mall in Kareedouw in the East...
05 Feb 2016
Fine & Country Zimbabwe recently opened a new office in Borrowdale, an u...
05 Feb 2016
We think of lavish mansions adorning the mountain slopes, but you can st...
Get the latest property news.
Select your options:

Your browser is out of date!

It looks like you are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer.

If you are using Internet Explorer 8 or higher, please verify that your Internet Explorer compatibility view settings are not enabled.

For the best browsing experience, update to the latest Version of Internet Explorer or try out Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Please contact our Property24 Support Team for further assistance. Tel. +27 (0)861 111 724