18 Oct 2013
There are at least two ways of looking at the credit amnesty that has just been approved by Cabinet.
This is according to Berry Everitt, MD of the Chas Everitt International property group, who says the amnesty provides for a once-off removal of all adverse information from consumers’ credit bureaux records, irrespective of value and even if the debt has not been paid – effectively giving everyone a ‘clean slate’. In addition, it provides for future paid-up debts and judgments to be removed from consumer credit records on an ongoing basis.
He says from the point of view of consumers who have found themselves unable to obtain new credit because they are blacklisted or have old ‘black marks’ on their credit records, this must obviously sound like a great idea. It must be especially appealing to those who are keen to buy their first home but have been refused a home loan because of relatively minor credit transgressions, many of them long since rectified, are still reflected in their credit histories.
Although no start date for the amnesty has been announced yet, the objective, according to a Cabinet statement, is to address the issue of access to credit by consumers who may have paid their debts in full and are in a position to afford credit but whose access is currently impeded by negative credit information on their record.
However, Everitt says consumers do need to be aware that the banks and other credit providers have an entirely different view and have vigorously resisted the amnesty. Apart from worries about consumers seeing the amnesty as a debt pardon, they say it will make it much more difficult for them to assess risk when considering new credit applications.
And because they will have no way of knowing who has been good at managing credit in the past, and who has not, they may even have to raise the price of credit – that is, the interest rates they charge to cover their additional risk, he says.
This would make it more difficult to qualify for home loans, and shut many potential buyers out of the market again, irrespective of the credit amnesty, because they don’t have sufficient disposable income, says Everitt.
In other words, he says, the amnesty could well end up as a catch 22 situation, with only one way out for prospective home buyers - pay down debts in order to increase disposable income and then save up a substantial deposit before applying for a home loan.
If you are using Internet Explorer 8 or higher, please verify that your Internet Explorer compatibility view settings are not enabled.
For the best browsing experience, update to the latest Version of Internet Explorer or try out Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.
Please contact our Property24 Support Team for further assistance. Tel. +27 (0)861 111 724